NASA MONITOR -- PART 1
LIARS, THIEVES, PLAGIARIZERS
MONEY WASTERS AND SQUANDERERS
UPDATE -- 22 June 2000: NASA is at its fund raising " water needed for life" deception trick again trying to justify (suck up) more tax billions to waste and to keep the NASA fat cats wallowing in your and our tax dollars. Yesterday, through many lie supporting, deceptive fund raising TV news channels and newspapers, NASA announced that it had found water bubbling up to the surface "all over" Mars. Now if that is true, just why did it take the Mars Global Surveyor -- which has been taking photographs of Mars (which NASA habitually misinterprets) for more than two years -- to finally detect it?? Or are we just stretching the truth a bit here, NASA, to justify wasting even more tax dollars on yet another of your many failed probes of Mars.
It's the same old fake NASA line that they have used time and time again to help justify and waste tax dollars -- " where there is water, life may be able to exist" along with the notion that finding water they are going to discover for the first time alien intelligent life on Mars (which is a big fat lie for they fully know it has already been discovered). As you, NASA, very well know, you have been told time and time again there IS LIFE ON MARS FOR SLAUGHTER ENGINEERING DISCOVERED THEM WELL OVER A YEAR AGO -- AND THEY DON'T NEED WATER -- GET IT THROUGH YOUR EXCEPTIONALLY THICK SKULLS, NASA -- THEY DON'T, THEY DON'T, THEY DON'T NEED WATER. And using some reasoning power which you, NASA, habitually fails to do, if the Global Surveyor can detect water bubbling up to the surface, then just why can't the Global Surveyor also detect this "water-sustaining life" you are supposedly looking for -- saving the wasting of up to and possibly over $400 billion to send manned probes to find what Slaughter Engineering has already discovered well over a year ago. Does that make any sense to anyone else? Absolutely not.
So here is how this DUMB-NASA-MARS situation stacks up at the present:
But are they really that dumb? Rhetorical question. Even though they are most convincing, don't be taken in. It all boils down to what they believe is clever, but devious, fund soliciting to keep NASA alive and generously funded. To do so their devious pitch is the claim that they are searching for water and when miraculously found they will be the first to discover alien life -- another big fat NASA lie of course. For they know perfectly well -- for we have told them time and time again -- that we have already discovered alien intelligent life not only on Mars but throughout the Universe and that they definitely don't require water. Conversely, if they could honestly admit to our discoveries (far beyond their level of integrity) their eternal search for the "holy grail", "fountain of youth" search for extraterrestrial life would be blown away and they wouldn't have a sufficiently enticing mystery goal to fleece the public out of more funds to keep them alive and generously overly funded.
But NASA's FOLLY does have historic value to the the current pathetic level of science and astronomy in this area of endeavor. It bares for all to see that the "state of the art" of science and astronomy as currently practiced by such as NASA, the SAGS, the OSPs (Old Science Practitioners) and apparently most other scientists and astronomers in this field of endeavor is extremely lacking essential knowledge in the truth and facts about the Universe and life within it.
For while they are hung up and dwelling on the admission that they haven't found extraterrestrial life as yet and such as this single, simplistic, misleading falsehood that extraterrestrial life requires water to exist --- we recognized and ignored that idiocy long ago; have discovered the extremely capable and intelligent life which exists throughout the Universe; have presented photographs of them and much of what they have achieved; have shown and explained to the World how the Solar System and the Universe itself has been created -- leaving these apparently deaf, dumb and blind Big Bang Believers to dwell seemingly forever in their most ignorant false fantasies of the Universe and life within it. Won't they, can't they ever wise up. Very doubtful.
24 May 2000: It is just now being revealed that the totally unjustified, insanely costly International Space Station, if not stopped before the insanity continues, will cost the American Tax Payer a minimum of ONE HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS just to start with -- that's an insane 100 BILLION DOLLARS. That is, if we are lucky -- for first of all, NASA habitually and intentionally underestimates the true cost of their wild out of control squandering of public money on nearly every project they have dreamed up so far and this is the wildest and most costly of all. And secondly, if some of the International partners involved in this International Idiocy fail to pay up, NASA expects the U S Taxpayer to step up to their idiocy and pay for it. Tell your Congressmen to JUST SAY NO to any further wild spending by NASA including any further idiocy on this International Space Station.
They are trying to justify their idiotic spending by claiming it will be an International relations thing -- but they are not even getting along with the Russians now to say nothing of the future when the financing of the insanity becomes even more questionable and difficult especially among the other participants. If anything, it will worsen International public relations -- not improve them. So there is no justification here and nowhere else for that matter.
You just paid $250,000 for a replacement battery on the ISS -- International Space Station. Are we going to continue to pay for and permit this NASA uncontrolled idiocy to continue??? JUST SAY NO TO YOUR CONGRESSMEN.
MONITOR of
SAGs
EXCEEDINGLY SLOW
CATCH-UP BUT AT LONG LAST THEIR STILL CONCEALED FROM THE PUBLIC
CONFIRMATION OF OUR FAR-ADVANCED KNOWLEDGE OF THE FACTS AND TRUTH OF
THE DISCOVERY OF THE SIBS AND THEIR CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE AS
PRESENTED HEREIN BY SLAUGHTER ENGINEERING
Based upon traits revealed by the low-integrity, low-principled NASA themselves, they continue to expose for all the World to see their exceptionally low principles and integrity. In a period of over a year, among others:
Inasmuch as the suck-up to government (NASA) news media still refuses to publish the facts and truth as we have discovered and revealed them to you herein, from this point forward we are obligated to monitor NASA's painfully slow advancement toward the facts and truth concerning the Creation of the Universe which although they are exceedingly tardy in doing so has the benefit of confirming what we have been attempting to inform you, the public, for well over a year, pertaining to the Creation of the Universe and those who created it -- the SIBs. The monitoring begins:
14
November 1999: NASA
obviously has looked
at and has accepted at least some of the facts that they might be
able to comprehend in our section on "Capella,
the Rosetta Stone Star of the Universe",
then compared some of their old Hubbell pictures with our facts and
have now announced that "Hubbell has revealed the early life of
stars." If they knew that before our revelations at this Website, why
didn't they publish such previous to this??? Come on NASA, for once
be honest and forthright and show us written proof you knew of the
process of the birth of stars before our Website explained it
to the World including you. Does this mean you have given up on the
ridiculous Big Bang ?
NASA's Website: http://oposite.stsci.edu/pubinfo/pr/1999/33/index.html states in more detail the following in yellow which is followed by our comments in blue:
"Hubbell Captures a Grand View of the Birth of "Hefty" Stars Images taken in infrared and visible light by NASA's Hubbell Space Telescope recount a vivid story of the turbulent birthing process of massive stars."
Most if not all the pictures NASA is referring were taken long ago but they had no idea whatsoever as to what they were looking at. But now, at long, long last, NASA is beginning to learn and now claim as their own discovery (a trait of exceedingly low-principles and low-integrity) what we have known long before NASA is now starting to wise up to the fact that some (not all, NASA) STARS ARE BORN and not made haphazardly from residue from the comical, now totally dead Big Bang theory previously and amazingly believed in by NASA and other SAGs. Bravo for starting to inch up to the truth but you, NASA and other SAGs are still far, far behind in comprehending the facts and truth about the Universe as explained in detail herein.
NASA states "The pictures show that powerful radiation and high-speed material unleashed by "hefty" adult stars residing in the hub of the 30 Doradus Nebula are triggering a new burst of star birth in the surrounding suburbs."
The "high-speed material" being unleashed are the active adult SIBs and/or BABY STARS being born and released to seek their place in the Universe. The "hefty" adult stars (Mother Star Capella is a "hefty" 11 million miles in diameter) are as we have explained, the Mother Stars wherein the Star Egg Cells were deposited by the explained very complicated process by adult SIBs and were incubated therein until released to take their place in the Universe.
They frequently refer to "nursery and incubator stars" neither of which descriptions had we seen NASA use before our explanation of them at this Website which NASA is now copying and using without acknowledging and giving professional credit to Slaughter Engineering as the discoverers as would any honorable entity. But NASA, no, to their future great disadvantage, they can't seem to come up with the necessary honor and integrity to do so.
Now NASA, where do you go with your newfound, but plagiarized from Slaughter Engineering, discoveries? You must try to comprehend it is a tragic mistake on your part that you can not bring yourselves to acknowledge: 1) the SIBs; 2) as the Creators of the Universe, 3) Slaughter Engineering as the discoverers; 3) other startling facts about the Universe that Slaughter Engineering has uncovered -- for without acknowledging these facts, NASA, you are stopped dead in your tracks -- for: